Exposing Dongguk University: Racialized Sexual Violence, Institutional Betrayal, and Alleged Public Funds Fraud (2016–2025)

Korean Government Systematic Censorship of LGBT Military Content: Evidence of Institutional Suppression

Systematic Censorship of LGBT Military Content on DC Inside: Evidence of Institutional Suppression

On July 5, 2025, Gender Watchdog posted content addressing systematic sexual violence against LGBT individuals in the Korean military across 20+ university galleries on DC Inside, Korea's largest online forum. Within 12-15 hours, every single post was systematically deleted across all galleries simultaneously, showing zero views and identical error messages. This pattern is consistent with coordinated institutional censorship unprecedented in scope and timing.

Visual evidence of this systematic deletion is available at: https://drive.proton.me/urls/6CWNPEJVCW#sirf8ZW4AhT8 - these screenshots show the identical error pages that appear when attempting to access any of the deleted posts. Additionally, you can verify the zero view counts for all posts with "_military_lgbt" in their names by checking our real-time monitoring at https://dashboard.genderwatchdog.org.

When we contacted DC Inside for explanation, their response suggests external pressure while attempting to maintain plausible deniability. This censorship occurred precisely when our campaign was gaining significant momentum in uniting diverse Korean demographics under a "defamation law abolition" platform—a reform that would dismantle the legal framework protecting institutional sexual violence.

Strategic Context: Momentum and Coalition Building

Prior to this censorship, our campaigns had achieved remarkable success in building cross-ideological support among Korean university students. Our analysis documents show:

Phase 1: Building Foundation (June 2025)

Our "Fire Sex Criminals" campaign achieved exceptional engagement:

Phase 2: Strategic Expansion (July 2025)

The "defamation law" series was designed to unite feminists and anti-feminists under a shared platform:

Phase 3: Systematic Censorship Response (July 1, 2025)

The systematic deletion occurred precisely when this coalition-building was succeeding, suggesting institutional recognition that unified young Korean opposition to defamation law represents an existential threat to institutional corruption.

The Censored Content: Evidence of What Triggered the Systematic Deletion

The censored post specifically connected military sexual violence to defamation law protection, showing how legal frameworks silence victims while protecting perpetrators. Here is the complete censored content:

Korean Version (Censored Original):

명예훼손법이 군대 내 성범죄자들을 보호하고 젊은 남성들을 침묵시키는 방법

한국 군대에서 성소수자에 대한 체계적 성폭력이 발생하고 있습니다. 그런데 왜 아무도 처벌받지 않을까요? 명예훼손법이 가해자들을 보호하고 피해자들을 침묵시키기 때문입니다.

군대 내 성소수자 성폭력의 끔찍한 실상

한국 군대에서 동성애자로 의심받는 군인들이 당하는 일들: • 성폭행, 구타, 변기물 강제 음용 • 서로 성행위를 강요당하며 다른 군인들이 구경 • 4명이 학대로 인해 자살 시도 • 2017년 "게이 색출" 작전으로 수십 명 체포

성소수자가 아닌 군인이 피해자를 도우려 하면 어떻게 될까요? 그들도 함께 성폭행당하며 "너도 게이냐"는 조롱을 받습니다.

명예훼손법이 만드는 완벽한 침묵 시스템

성소수자 피해자들이 신고하지 못하는 이유: • 진실을 말해도 "동성애 조장"으로 명예훼손 고발 당함 • 가해자들이 "명예 훼손했다"며 오히려 피해자를 고소 • "공익성"을 증명하지 못하면 피해자가 감옥행 • 언론도 보도하면 명예훼손으로 처벌받을 위험

똑똑한 젊은 남성들에게 묻습니다

여러분이 군대에서 성소수자 동료가 성폭행당하는 걸 목격했다고 상상해보세요: 선택지 1: 도우려 하면 → 여러분도 성폭행당함 + 게이로 낙인 + 명예훼손 고발로 전과자 선택지 2: 침묵하면 → 가해자들이 계속 더 많은 사람들을 성폭행함

이것이 한국 사회가 젊은 남성들에게 강요하는 "선택"입니다.

성소수자든 아니든, 모든 젊은 남성이 피해자

• 성소수자 남성: 직접적인 성폭력과 법적 침묵 강요 • 이성애자 남성: 도덕적 고민과 공범 강요, 여성혐오로 유도됨 • 모든 젊은 남성: 독성 남성성 문화에 갇혀 건강한 관계 형성 불가능

왜 나이든 가해자들은 처벌받지 않나요?

명예훼손법 덕분에: • 피해자들이 사실을 말하면 오히려 범죄자가 됨 • 언론이 보도하면 "군 명예 훼손"으로 고발당함 • 가해 장교들은 전역 후에도 법적 보호 받음 • 시민사회의 비판도 "국가 기관 명예 훼손"으로 차단

결과: 제로섬 파괴 사이클

• 성소수자 젊은 남성들이 자살하거나 사회에서 완전히 배제됨 • 이성애자 젊은 남성들도 도덕적 트라우마와 여성혐오에 빠짐 • 군대 문화 전체가 성폭력을 정상화함 • 전역 후에도 독성 남성성을 사회 전체로 확산 • 건강한 남성 롤모델이 사라져 다음 세대도 같은 고통

이 독성 남성성은 대학가로 이어집니다

군대에서 형성된 독성 남성성과 여성혐오는 대학 진학 후에도 계속됩니다: • 예술대학 여학생 61.5%, 남학생 17.2%가 성폭력 피해 경험 (2020년 여성정책연구원 보고서) • 이 중 65.5% 이상이 교수에 의한 성폭력 • 영화학과는 성폭력 위험도 81/100점으로 최고 위험군 • 명예훼손법 때문에 대학 내 성폭력 피해자들도 침묵 강요받음

현재 남학생들도 같은 딜레마에 갇혀 있습니다: • 선배나 교수의 성폭력을 목격하면 → 신고했다가 자신도 따돌림당하고 학점 보복 + 명예훼손 고발 • 침묵하면 → 공범 의식과 죄책감으로 더 극단적인 독성 남성성에 빠져들어 성폭력 정상화 • 결국 피해자를 비난하거나 성폭력을 "그럴 수 있는 일"로 합리화하며 자신을 보호 • 일부는 아예 성폭력에 직접 참여하여 가해자 집단에 합류하기도 함

군대에서 성폭력을 목격하고도 침묵하도록 강요받은 남성들이 교수가 되어 같은 시스템을 재현하고, 현재 남학생들도 똑같은 강요된 침묵 속에서 공범이 되거나 가해자로 변해갑니다. 명예훼손법이 있는 한 이 악순환은 계속됩니다.

해결책: 명예훼손법 폐지

명예훼손법을 폐지하면: • 성소수자 피해자들이 안전하게 신고 가능 • 이성애자 남성들도 목격한 성폭력을 신고할 수 있음 • 언론이 군대 내 성폭력을 자유롭게 보도 가능 • 가해자들이 법적 보호막 없이 처벌받음 • 독성 남성성 문화가 깨지고 건강한 관계 문화로 전환

젊은 세대, 선택하세요

계속 나이든 성범죄자들의 법적 보호막 속에서 서로를 해치며 살 것인가? 아니면 명예훼손법을 폐지하여 모든 젊은 남성이 인간답게 살 수 있는 사회를 만들 것인가?

성소수자든 이성애자든, 모든 젊은 남성의 인권이 걸린 문제입니다.

지금 명예훼손법을 폐지하라.

English Version (Translation):

How Defamation Law Protects Military Sex Criminals and Silences Young Men

Systematic sexual violence against LGBT individuals is occurring in the Korean military. But why is no one being punished? Because defamation law protects perpetrators and silences victims.

The Horrific Reality of LGBT Sexual Violence in the Military

What happens to soldiers suspected of being gay in the Korean military: • Sexual violence, beatings, forced consumption of toilet water • Forced to perform sexual acts on each other while other soldiers watch • 4 individuals attempted suicide due to sexual violence • 2017 "gay witch hunt" operation resulted in dozens of arrests

What happens when non-LGBT soldiers try to help victims? They are also subjected to sexual violence and mocked with "Are you gay too?"

Defamation Law Creates the Perfect Silencing System

Why LGBT victims cannot report: • Reporting sexual violence would expose them to Article 92-6 prosecution for admitting same-sex activity • Senior officer perpetrators sue victims for defamation, claiming reports "damage their reputation" • If you can't prove "public interest," victims go to prison instead • Media also risks defamation punishment if they report

A Question for Smart Young Men

Imagine you witness a gay fellow soldier experiencing sexual violence in the military: Option 1: Try to help → You also experience sexual violence + labeled gay + criminal record for defamation Option 2: Stay silent → Perpetrators continue committing sexual violence against more people

This is the "choice" Korean society forces upon young men.

Whether LGBT or Not, All Young Men Are Victims

• LGBT men: Direct sexual violence and legal silencing • Heterosexual men: Moral dilemma and forced complicity, channeled into misogyny • All young men: Trapped in toxic masculinity culture, unable to form healthy relationships

Why Don't Older Perpetrators Get Punished?

Thanks to defamation law: • Victims become criminals just for stating facts • Media gets sued for "damaging military honor" if they report • Perpetrator officers receive legal protection even after discharge • Civil society criticism is blocked as "defaming state institutions"

Result: Zero-Sum Destruction Cycle

• LGBT young men commit suicide or are completely excluded from society • Heterosexual young men also fall into moral trauma and misogyny • Military culture as a whole normalizes sexual violence • Toxic masculinity spreads throughout society even after discharge • Healthy male role models disappear, causing the same suffering for the next generation

This toxic masculinity carries over to universities

The toxic masculinity and misogyny formed in the military continues after entering university: • 61.5% of female and 17.2% of male students in arts programs experience sexual violence (2020 KWDI report) • Over 65.5% of these incidents of sexual violence are perpetrated by faculty • Film departments have an 81/100 risk score for sexual violence, making them the highest risk category • Due to defamation law, university sexual violence victims are also forced into silence

Current male students are trapped in the same dilemma: • If they witness sexual violence by seniors or professors → Report it and face ostracism, grade retaliation + defamation lawsuits • If they stay silent → Guilt and complicity drive them toward more extreme toxic masculinity that normalizes sexual violence • They end up blaming victims or rationalizing sexual violence as "something that can happen" to protect themselves • Some even participate directly in sexual violence to join the perpetrator group

Men who were forced to stay silent about military sexual violence become professors reproducing the same system, while current male students face identical forced silence that turns them into accomplices or perpetrators. As long as defamation law exists, this vicious cycle will continue.

Solution: Abolish Defamation Law

If we abolish defamation law: • LGBT victims can safely report • Heterosexual men can also report sexual violence they witness • Media can freely report military sexual violence • Perpetrators face punishment without legal shields • Toxic masculinity culture breaks and transforms into healthy relationship culture

Young Generation, Choose

Will you continue living in a system where you hurt each other under the legal protection of older sex criminals? Or will you abolish defamation law to create a society where all young women and men, regardless of race, nationality, sexual orientation, can live with dignity?

Whether LGBT or heterosexual, this affects the human rights of all young women and men.

Abolish defamation law now.

DC Inside's Response: Evidence of External Pressure

When we contacted DC Inside asking why these posts were systematically deleted, their response was revealing. DC Inside's response suggests they found themselves in an impossible position - compelled to censor content while trying to maintain plausible deniability about external pressure.

DC Inside's Full Response (Korean): "안녕하세요. 디시인사이드입니다.

당사는 이용약관 및 이용안내에 따라 사이트를 운영하고 있으며, 자살, 불법촬영물, 아동·청소년 유해물 등 특정 키워드에 대한 관리를 진행하고 있습니다. 다만, 문의주신 키워드는 현재 관리 대상에 포함되어 있지 않음을 안내드립니다. 또한 신고 처리 및 게시물 삭제와 관련된 사항은 모두 안내해드리기 어려운 점 양해 부탁드립니다. 자세한 내용은 아래 링크의 이용안내 및 이용약관을 참고해주시기 바랍니다."

Translation: "Hello. This is DC Inside.

We operate our site according to our terms of use and usage guidelines, and we manage certain keywords including suicide, illegal filming, and content harmful to children and adolescents. However, we inform you that the keyword you inquired about is not currently included in our management targets. Also, please understand that we cannot provide full guidance on matters related to report processing and post deletion."

Analysis: What DC Inside's Response Suggests

DC Inside's response suggests the impossible position private platforms face under external censorship pressure. Their response - stating LGBT military keywords are "not currently included in our management targets" while refusing to explain the deletion process - indicates they may have been compelled to censor while trying to signal the truth.

Here's what their response pattern suggests:

  1. "LGBT military keywords are NOT on our automated list" = Distancing from the deletion decision
  2. "We can't explain our deletion process" = Inability to discuss external directives
  3. Generic deflection to terms of service = Standard corporate protection language

This communication pattern is consistent with corporate responses under external pressure. By specifically stating that LGBT military keywords are not included in their management targets while refusing to explain the deletion process, DC Inside appears to be:

Why This Censorship Occurred: Strategic Institutional Pre-emption

The systematic intervention appears strategically timed to prevent a natural escalation that would have threatened institutional corruption:

The Planned Series Progression:

  1. LGBT Military Violence (censored before posting)
  2. Defamation Law Protecting Military Sex Criminals (censored)
  3. Politicians Using Defamation Law (Lee Jae-myung, Yoon Seok-yeol, Park Geun-hye)
  4. Government Corruption in AI Policy (OpenAI selection over superior Korean alternatives)

Evidence of Coordinated Response:

International Implications: Student Safety and Human Rights

This censorship has serious implications for international students and partner institutions:

For International Students:

For Partner Institutions:

For International Law:

Evidence Pattern: Systematic Institutional Suppression

This censorship is consistent with a broader pattern of Korean institutional suppression:

Target Demographics:

The Broader Context: Institutional Suppression Patterns

This censorship is consistent with concerning patterns in Korean institutional suppression:

Institutional Coordination:

International Implications:

Conclusion: A Critical Moment

The systematic censorship of LGBT military content on DC Inside represents more than platform content moderation—it suggests coordinated institutional suppression of human rights discourse that may directly threaten international student safety and violate international human rights standards.

This censorship occurred precisely when our coalition-building efforts were succeeding in uniting diverse Korean demographics under a shared platform of legal reform. The institutional response indicates that unified opposition to defamation law represents an existential threat to institutional corruption.

The institutional response to our human rights advocacy demonstrates that current legal frameworks are specifically designed to silence victims—particularly international students—while protecting institutional perpetrators. This represents a clear violation of international human rights standards and poses direct risks to the safety of international students in Korean institutions.

DC Inside's response reveals the impossible position private platforms face under external censorship pressure, and provides concrete evidence of systematic institutional interference in free speech and human rights discourse.

Documentation and Evidence:

This analysis is shared for academic integrity and human rights documentation purposes. The systematic censorship of LGBT human rights content represents a critical moment in Korean civil society that requires international attention and oversight.