Die in Justice: Chung-Ang University's Partnership Fraud, Criminal Leadership, and Twenty-One Years of Sexual Violence Cover-Ups (updated at 2026-03-11T02:55:05Z)
An investigative report into Chung-Ang University's phantom international partnerships, the 2008 Doosan corporate takeover, missing accountability for sexual violence, and structural academic fraud in South Korea.
의에 죽고 진리에 살자
Die in Justice, Live in Truth.
That is the official motto of Chung-Ang University, inscribed on the institution's seal and repeated in every piece of international marketing material the university sends to prospective students, partner universities, and rankings bodies.1
The documented record below is the answer to that motto.
Part I: The Phantom Prestige Network (27% Reciprocity)
CAU markets itself internationally as Korea's premier arts university — home to one of the oldest theatre and film programs in Korea (est. 1959), the country's only graduate film school to run all four phases of the government's elite BK21 program, and a gateway into the Korean streaming industry through direct CJ E&M and Netflix content partnerships.
The institution's international appeal is built substantially on its claimed global network of partner universities. According to CAU's own promotional materials and partner pages — prior to February 2026, when they were deleted — the university maintained exchange and partnership relationships with over 600 institutions worldwide, including many of the world's top-ranked universities.
Gender Watchdog conducted an independent reciprocity audit of 63 of CAU's highest-ranked claimed partner universities. The methodology was precise: for each institution on CAU's list, we navigated to that institution's own public partner or exchange student directory and searched for "Chung-Ang." We did not rely on CAU's claims. We checked what the partner institutions say themselves.
The result: a 27% reciprocity rate.
Of 49 entries where the target institution maintained a publicly accessible partner directory, only 13 confirmed a partnership with CAU. 36 did not list CAU at all.2
The 36 absent universities include institutions that CAU was actively marketing as partners to prospective students and ranking bodies. Among them:
- Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (QS 12) — Korea partner list publicly accessible; CAU absent
- UC Berkeley (QS 17) — lists KAIST, Korea University, SNU, and Yonsei for Korea exchange; CAU not present
- University of Manchester (QS 35) — lists Ewha, Korea University, SNU, Yonsei; CAU absent
- Duke University (QS 62) — The South Korea country page is entirely blank (since at least 2020), and Duke has explicitly frozen all new bilateral undergraduate exchanges globally. CAU claimed a Duke partnership in 2025–2026 despite Duke's exchange infrastructure for Korea being publicly dead for half a decade. ([Screenshot of blank page placeholder] — Source: Megalodon Archive: https://megalodon.jp/2026-0311-0802-31/https://global.duke.edu:443/countries/south-korea; Megalodon Archive (frozen exchanges): https://megalodon.jp/2026-0311-0805-35/https://global.duke.edu:443/partnerships)
- UC San Diego (QS 66) — 26 Korean partner institutions listed; CAU not among them
- Erasmus University Rotterdam (QS 140) — lists Hanyang, Korea University, SNU, and Yonsei for Korea; CAU absent
- Ohio State University (QS 190) — CAU holds only an MOU with OSU; the student exchange program is Sogang-only. OSU explicitly distinguishes between MOU institutions and exchange partners on their own international programs page.
- IIT Madras (QS 180) — lists DGIST, Hanyang, KAIST, Korea University, POSTECH, SNU, Sungkyunkwan, and Yonsei for student exchange; CAU is listed as an MOU-only institution, not an exchange partner.
The prestige inflation concentrated in the top tier of CAU's claimed list is the most significant finding. CAU's only top-15 prestige claim is the University of Chicago (QS 13) — and this was verified only via an internal database search engine, not a publicly visible student exchange partner listing. No prospective student or accreditation reviewer could independently locate it. Its second-highest prestige claim, HK Polytechnic University (QS 54), turns out to be a department-only LMS agreement presented to the public as a full institutional partnership. Genuine university-wide exchange confirmations in the CAU audit begin only at QS ~170.
Two additional entries carry documented expiry or scope problems. CAU's partnership with Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM, QS 126) is a Faculty of Engineering agreement that formally expired on July 31, 2025 — yet CAU continues to list it as a current partnership. The Shandong University (Weihai campus) listing refers to a campus that does not list CAU; only the main Ji'nan campus has a confirmed agreement.
Professor John Ioannidis of Stanford University's Meta-Research Innovation Center, briefed on this audit pattern in January 2026, assessed that institutions operating in this ecosystem are "addicted to gaming" rankings and partnership claims.3
Every institution in Appendix 1A at the bottom of this post has a publicly accessible partner directory. Click any link in that appendix. Search for "Chung-Ang." It is not there.
The Response to the Audit: Delete the Evidence
Gender Watchdog shared the findings of this reciprocity audit with the world's top 400 universities in early 2026 as part of an ongoing outreach campaign.
On February 11, 2026, Chung-Ang University took its international partner database offline. Sogang University — whose own audit showed a 41% reciprocity rate — did the same, simultaneously, on the same day.4
Neither institution disputed the methodology. Neither institution issued a correction, a rebuttal, or a counter-audit. They deleted the evidence.
This is not an administrative coincidence. The simultaneous database removal is consciousness of guilt, documented.
It follows an already-established pattern in Korean higher education. Dongguk University, the institution whose phantom partnership fraud initiated this investigation, previously deleted UBC from its partner page and reverted the name "Toronto Metropolitan University" to the obsolete name "Ryerson University" in a botched cover-up attempt that Gender Watchdog caught via VisualPing monitoring. CAU and Sogang's February 11 action is the same response at institutional scale: the audit arrives, the databases disappear.4
Seoul National University — Korea's highest-ranked institution — pulled its partner database offline in the same period.5
The sector-wide pattern is clear. The QS ranking infrastructure that elevates these institutions commercially does not independently audit claimed partnership portfolios.5 It ranks what institutions claim, not what partner institutions confirm.
Part II: How CAU Stopped Being a University (The Doosan Capture)
To understand how a university arrives at 27% reciprocity rates, zero permanent disciplinary bans, and a 20-billion-won fraud investigation all in the same institutional record, it helps to understand precisely when and how CAU ceased to be a self-governing academic institution.
May 2008: Doosan Group, one of Korea's major industrial chaebols, acquires the CAU educational foundation for approximately 120 billion won (~$120 million USD). Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction Chairman Park Yong-sung becomes the 9th Chairman of the CAU Board of Directors.6
August 27, 2008 — within 80 days of the acquisition: Park Yong-sung presents the CAU2018+ restructuring plan. The centerpiece: the abolition of the direct election system for the university presidency, replaced by a Doosan-controlled appointment mechanism.67
92% of CAU faculty voted against the restructuring. They were overridden.7
2010: The CAU student union files a formal lawsuit against the Doosan foundation over suspected surveillance of student activists.7
The governance structure under which the following years operated — the serial sexual violence, the HR delays, the adjunct loophole invocations, the financial fraud — was not the product of institutional drift or negligence. It was purchased. One hundred and twenty billion won bought a chaebol the right to run a Korean university's human resources and disciplinary processes without faculty accountability. The 92% who voted against it were overridden. This is the structural condition in which everything else documented below occurred.
Part III: The Men at the Top (Two Investigations, One Conviction, One Resignation)
Park Beom-hoon: CAU President, Presidential Secretary, Convicted Felon
February 2009: One year after the Doosan takeover, CAU's newly unelected president Park Beom-hoon makes a public statement about female students. Reported in Ohmynews (Feb 23, 2009) and Kyunghyang Shinmun (Feb 26, 2009), the statement — "조그만 토종이 감칠맛 있어" — rendered female students as objects for male consumption.7
There were no institutional consequences. The man who had just been installed via a governance coup described the female students in his institution's care as sexual objects for male pleasure, and the Doosan-controlled administration produced no public record of discipline or rebuke.
2012: Park Beom-hoon, then serving as Chief Presidential Secretary for Education and Culture under President Lee Myung-bak, allegedly pressured the Ministry of Education to approve CAU's Seoul-Anseong campus merger despite the plan failing to meet the Ministry's own land requirements. By circumventing those requirements, Doosan is alleged to have avoided acquiring tens of billions of won in additional land it would otherwise have been legally required to purchase.8
May 1, 2015: Park Beom-hoon is arrested after 19 hours of questioning by prosecutors.8
Charges included:
- Receiving 1.8 billion won (~$1.6M USD) from Doosan through a front foundation ("Mootsori")
- Receiving a 300-million-won commercial unit registered in his wife's name
- A board seat at Doosan Engine Company — a direct conflict of interest for a university president governed by Doosan
- His daughter receiving a CAU professorship under circumstances prosecutors investigated as "questionable"
- The Woori Bank kickback: Park is alleged to have granted Woori Bank exclusive rights to all banking services on CAU's two campuses in exchange for a 10-billion-won "donation" that was routed through a dubious account and partially diverted from school use8
Park Beom-hoon was convicted and imprisoned — one of the rare Korean university corruption prosecutions to result in an actual prison sentence.
Park Yong-sung: Foundation Chairman, "Axe Those Begging to Be Axed"
April 2015: An email Park Yong-sung sent to approximately 20 faculty members who had opposed his restructuring plans is leaked to Kyunghyang Shinmun and published nationally.
The email states that he would "axe those begging to be axed." It goes further: it names a specific female professor in CAU's German Language Department as a target.9
This is not a private threat. It was email correspondence from the Chairman of the institution's governing foundation, addressed to faculty by name, threatening them for dissent. He specifically identified a woman by name as someone to be removed.
The same week, prosecutors announced that CAU's educational foundation was under investigation for accounting fraud totaling 20.3 billion won (~$18M USD), involving the misuse of institutional funds for unauthorized purposes.10
Park Yong-sung resigned simultaneously as: CAU Foundation Chairman, Chairman of Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction, and honorary Chairman of the Korean Olympic Committee.9
One CAU president jailed for corruption. One CAU foundation chairman resigned under a 20-billion-won fraud investigation after threatening female professors in writing. This is not a peripheral footnote on CAU's institutional record. This is the governance layer under which the following 21 years of documented sexual violence operated.
Part IV: Twenty-One Years of Sexual Violence — Nine Perpetrators, Seven Departments, Zero Permanent Bans
A detailed chronological timeline of all confirmed cases is being compiled at a dedicated documentation site. [TIMELINE SITE PLACEHOLDER — chung-ang.genderwatchdog.org, currently in development] The summary below covers confirmed cases with verified sources.
The record of sexual violence at Chung-Ang University is not a wave. It is a continuous document spanning from 1998 to at least 2019 — two decades — across at least seven academic departments, with nine confirmed perpetrators, and zero confirmed instances of the harshest disciplinary sanction (파면, permanent dismissal bar) being applied despite multiple Human Rights Center recommendations to do so.
Summary Table: Confirmed Cases
| Year | Perpetrator | Department | Acts | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | Professor (Dance) | Department of Dance | Habitual coercion and sexual assault of male students | Prison (3 years, 1999); 1 year on appeal (2001); re-indicted for witness tampering (2003) |
| 2009–2018 | Prof K | Asian Cultural Studies | Serial sexual assault of female grad students ×4+, classroom normalization, research embezzlement | 파면 recommended by HR Center (2018); final outcome unconfirmed |
| 2013 | Lecturer A | Sculpture, College of Arts | Sexual assault of 4 female students, attempted motel abduction | Adjunct loophole invoked; no formal disciplinary record created; violated settlement terms; police complaint 2018 |
| 2014 | Prof J | Unconfirmed dept | Sexual assault of student (admitted) | HR committee delayed; J resigned before discipline issued; rehired at Russian university |
| 2017 | Prof L | Same dept as J | Sexual assault of female grad student | 해임 (3-year bar; not permanent) |
| 2018 | Prof K (continued) | Asian Cultural Studies | As above | HR Center 파면 recommendation; final outcome unconfirmed |
| 2018 | Lecturer A (re-exposed) | Sculpture | As above | Police investigation initiated |
| 2018 | Prof M | Same dept as J, L | Drug-facilitated rape; denied allegations | 해임; reportedly retained in national researcher database |
| 2018 | Prof B | Cultural Studies | Multiple victim-survivors; HR Center 파면 recommended | Final outcome unconfirmed |
| 2018 | Professor (Japanese Lit) | Japanese Literature | Habitual sexual assault at drinking gatherings | Outcome unknown |
| Nov 2018 | Prof A | English Literature | Drug-facilitated sexual violence; victim developed PTSD; perpetrator contacted victim post-assault | 해임, June 2019; students publicly demanded 파면 |
1998: The Foundation (The Cover-Up Instinct Predates Doosan)
On February 5, 1998, three male students in CAU's Department of Dance filed a criminal complaint against their professor, alleging habitual coercion and sexual assault over an extended period. At the time, the same professor held the position of Director of the Korea National Dance Company (국립무용단장) — Korea's most prestigious public dance role.11
He was sentenced to three years imprisonment on October 7, 1999, removed from the National Dance Company directorship the prior day. On appeal in 2001, he received a one-year sentence, ordered to prison on the spot. On November 10, 2003, he was re-indicted for witness tampering — actively suborning false testimony after his own conviction.11
The significance is structural: CAU's sexual violence culture and its associated instinct toward institutional suppression and obstruction precedes the Doosan takeover by a decade. What Doosan did after 2008 was not introduce a new set of behaviors — it industrialized and protected a pattern that was already present.
2009–2018: The Classroom as Distribution Channel (Prof K)
Professor K in CAU's Department of Asian Cultural Studies habitually sexually assaulted female graduate students beginning at least as early as 2009 — a documented pattern spanning at minimum six years before exposure.12
The acts themselves — forcing kisses, forced physical contact, groping at department trips, repeated forcible embracing — are the most visible dimension of the case. The more structurally significant record is what K said in class:
- "The person who stays until the very end of after-parties is the one who'll succeed."
- "If I were a woman I'd be confident I could succeed by flirting with famous curators."
- "You should let Teacher Bae touch your thigh — that's how you'll learn the meaning of life."1213
When one student raised Bae's documented groping of another student at an exhibition party, K's response: "If you want to survive as a female artist, you have to endure this kind of thing."
This is not deviant behavior disguised from the institution. This is professional socialization in public — a tenured professor transmitting, in the classroom, to enrolled students, the message that racialized sexual violence is the price of entry into the Korean arts industry. The institution's failure to detect or act on this for at minimum six years is not credibly explained by ignorance.
When four victim-survivors simultaneously filed reports with CAU's Human Rights Center in May 2018, the Center investigated and recommended 파면 — full permanent dismissal. The same investigation found K had been channeling research grant funds into a personal account.12 The final outcome of the 파면 recommendation remains unconfirmed in published records.
2013: The Adjunct Loophole, Acknowledged in Writing
On the night of June 12–13, 2013, adjunct lecturer "A" in CAU's Department of Sculpture sexually assaulted four female students at an end-of-semester party and attempted to take them to a motel.14
The victim-survivors went immediately to CAU's Human Rights Center. Then Professor "B" in the same department entered the Human Rights Center's process — the same mechanism designed to protect victim-survivors — and pressured the four women to reach a private settlement and prevent external disclosure. Lecturer A agreed to "cease artistic activities." He continued working in violation of that agreement.14
The case was suppressed for five years.
It was publicly exposed in March 2018 only when CAU's own Sculpture Department alumni association issued a formal public statement, calling for police investigation, a university apology, and the immediate dismissal of Professor B for pressuring victim-survivors.
CAU's stated response at the time of exposure included the following institutional explanation — published in national press:
"At the time, A was a part-time lecturer (시간강사) so a formal disciplinary action could not be imposed (정식 징계를 내릴 수 없어). We dismissed him from his lecturer position and subsequently barred him from teaching at the school."1415
This is not a discovered loophole. It is institutional policy, acknowledged out loud. A man who sexually assaulted four students and attempted to take them to a motel faced no formal disciplinary record because he was on part-time contract. The institution was aware of this outcome and described it to national media.
2014: The HR Delay / Export Tactic (Prof J)
Professor J sexually assaulted a student. Professor J admitted the acts. The case was reported in national press. The CAU HR committee then deliberately delayed disciplinary proceedings, allowing J time to submit a resignation before a formal disciplinary decision could be issued.
By resigning rather than being dismissed, J avoided any formal disciplinary record under Korean university employment law.
J was subsequently rehired at Russia's North-Eastern Federal University (북동연방대학교).16
A self-admitted perpetrator, with no academic record of the assault, crosses a border into a new university position with new students. The HR committee at CAU did not fail to run the process in time — the delay was the process.
2017–2019: The 해임/파면 Calibration — The Sanction Gap
Under Korean university employment law, the harshest sanction — 파면 (permanent dismissal, no rehire bar) — and the standard dismissal category — 해임 (dismissal with a three-year rehire bar) — are legally distinct outcomes with materially different consequences for perpetrators.
Looking at the three documented perpetrators in what NamuWiki's CAU incident record identifies as the same unnamed department across the years 2014, 2017, and 2018:
- Prof J (2014): Avoided discipline entirely through HR delay; resigned; rehired in Russia16
- Prof L (2017): Sexually assaulted a female graduate student; sanction — 해임 (three-year bar, not permanent)16
- Prof M (2018): Drug-facilitated rape; denied all allegations; sanction — 해임; reportedly retained in the Korean Researcher Information national database (한국연구자정보) as a CAU employee as of time of reporting16
Three perpetrators. One department. Four years. Zero permanent bans.
Prof A in the English Literature department (November 2018): sexually violated an undergraduate student incapacitated by prescription sleeping medication and alcohol. After the assault, A denied all allegations, continued calling the victim-survivor late at night, and requested direct meetings. The victim-survivor was diagnosed with PTSD and began psychiatric treatment. CAU students who organized the Emergency Committee for Resolving the Case publicly demanded 파면. The outcome: 해임, confirmed June 11, 2019.171819
The pattern of applying 해임 where 파면 is warranted — sometimes in direct opposition to the Human Rights Center's own recommendations, and always in the direction of preserving the perpetrator's eventual rehirability — is documented across multiple cases and multiple departments. This is calibration, not inconsistency.
Part V: The GSAIM Pipeline — Who Is Being Recruited Into This System
CAU's Graduate School of Advanced Imaging Science, Multimedia & Film (GSAIM, 첨단영상대학원) occupies a structurally unique position in Korea's media content economy:
- Korea's only BK21 film/imaging graduate school to have run all four phases of the government's prestige funding program
- Direct CJ E&M content partnerships — CJ E&M is Korea's largest entertainment conglomerate, the company behind the global distribution infrastructure of Korean cinema and television
- Active Netflix OTT content specialization program supported by significant industry and government funding
- Dozens of full-time professors; gender composition not yet publicly audited against the KWDI risk framework
Opened in 1999, GSAIM's entire existence overlaps both with CAU's pre-existing documented sexual violence culture (the 1998 dance case precedes it by one year) and with the Doosan governance capture era (2008 onward).
The Korean Women's Development Institute (KWDI) 2020 report on sexual violence in Korean arts and culture programs found that 61.5% of female students in these programs experience sexual violence, predominantly at the hands of male-dominated faculty. For film and media departments specifically, the report assigned a structural risk score of 81 out of 100. Korea Times reporting from June 2021 finds that 66% of all sexual violence at Korean universities across all disciplines is perpetrated by male-dominated faculty.2021
International students, for whom GSAIM's industry connections are a primary draw, are applying to this program partly on the basis of CAU's claimed global partnership network — HK Polytechnic (QS 54), the departmental-only agreement CAU presented as institutional; Ohio State, which holds an MOU with CAU but lists Sogang, not CAU, for student exchange. The credential marketing and the structural risk are not separable. Students from outside Korea who are recruited through false partnership claims and accepted into Korea's only BK21 film graduate school are entering a governance-captured institution with a documented 21-year sexual violence record and zero confirmed applications of the permanent disciplinary ban.22
Part VI: Proof of Concept, Proof of System
Dongguk University was where this investigation began. A film school on the opposite side of Seoul, with 33+ confirmed phantom partnerships including two Canadian universities — UBC (confirmed by UBC's removal of Dongguk from their own pages, caught via VisualPing) and a second Canadian institution that, in an email to Gender Watchdog, denied the existence of any partnership agreement and requested that we not name them to journalists or media.
Dongguk has not responded to Gender Watchdog since April 10, 2025.
CAU is not Dongguk. Its QS ranking is higher, its media industry integration is more substantial, its claimed partner portfolio is larger, and its institutional record of financial crime goes deeper. But the structure of the fraud, and the structure of the sexual violence cover-up, and — most importantly — the behavioral response when an independent external audit arrives, are identical: delete the evidence and wait.
Professor John Ioannidis of Stanford University's Meta-Research Innovation Center, briefed on this audit pattern in direct correspondence in January 2026, described institutions operating in this ecosystem as "addicted to gaming" rankings and partnership claims.3 The full email chain is archived on GitHub.3
The partnership fraud is not separate from the sexual violence cover-up. Both emerge from the same condition: an institution that, since 2008, has not been accountable to its students, its faculty majority, or the public — because the democratic governance mechanisms that would have produced that accountability were purchased and abolished with 120 billion won.
An institution that will allow an unelected president to publicly sexualize its students in the national press without consequence will not discipline a professor who tells graduate students that groping is the price of a career. These are expressions of the same governance failure.
Conclusion: "Live in Truth"
CAU's motto is 의에 죽고 진리에 살자 — "Die in Justice, Live in Truth."
Against that declared standard, the institution's documented record includes:
- A foundation chairman who threatened female professors by name in writing and resigned under a 20.3-billion-won fraud investigation
- A president who publicly sexualized female students in the national press, pressured government to deliver regulatory favors to the chaebol that owned him, and was subsequently convicted and imprisoned
- Nine confirmed perpetrators of sexual violence across at minimum seven academic departments over 21 years
- Cover-up mechanisms documented in the institution's own press statements — the adjunct loophole, the HR delay tactic, the 해임/파면 calibration
- Zero confirmed permanent disciplinary bans
- A 27% reciprocity rate in an independent audit of claimed international partnerships
- Both CAU and Sogang taking their partner databases offline on the same day in February 2026 — silently, without dispute, without rebuttal
We are not asking accreditation bodies, QS, partner universities, foreign embassies, or prospective students to trust our word. The Appendix below links directly to each partner institution's own public partner directory. The evidence is already online, at the other institution, waiting to be checked.
UPDATE: Back Online (after 65 Hours)
— Gender Watchdog (@Gender_Watchdog) February 14, 2026
Chung-Ang University (#11 Global Rank) has reappeared online as of midnight PST (Feb 14).
The Timeline:
1️⃣ Goes Dark: Feb 11
2️⃣ We Expose: Feb 12
3️⃣ Restored: Feb 14
They spent ~2.5 days in the dark. Now the real work begins: We are…
To international accreditation bodies: the partnership claims listed in CAU's institutional filings have been independently audited against the partner institutions' own records. The failure rate in the prestige tier is 73%. Renewal without independent verification is not due diligence — it is delegation of credentialing to an institution that has already demonstrated it will game any metric it can.
To QS and other commercial ranking agencies: you have been notified. CAU has taken its partner database offline rather than dispute these findings. Continued ranking without partnership verification is not a neutral act.
To universities receiving partnership solicitations from CAU: request independent reciprocity verification. Ask whether CAU appears on your own institution's published partner directories. For the majority of institutions in CAU's claimed top-400 network, the answer is no.
To foreign students and their embassies: the structural sexual violence risk in Korean arts and media programs is documented and quantified. The KWDI 2020 report is a primary source. The institutional record at CAU — nine confirmed perpetrators, zero confirmed permanent bans, governance captured by a convicted criminal class — is public record.
CAU's motto demands justice and truth. Their record documents the opposite. We are documenting it so others do not have to learn it after the fact.
A full chronological timeline of all confirmed sexual violence cases at Chung-Ang University, with primary source citations for each entry, is being compiled at a dedicated documentation site. [TIMELINE PLACEHOLDER — chung-ang.genderwatchdog.org — currently in development]
Footnotes
Appendix: Reciprocity Audit — Verify the Findings Yourself
Audit date: March 8, 2026 Methodology: For each university listed below, we navigated to the institution's own public partner/exchange directory and searched for the Korean claimant university. The verification URL links directly to the page we checked. Results are sorted by QS World University Rankings 2025.
Raw audit data (CSV): https://github.com/Gender-Watchdog/cau-timeline-website/blob/main/evidence/20260309-cau-reciprocity-audit/audit_results.csv
Appendix 1A — Chung-Ang University (CAU): Not Reciprocated
Of 63 claimed partner universities audited, 36 do not list CAU on their own public partner directories. A further 14 had no publicly accessible partner list. Of the 13 that do list CAU, two carry significant caveats (see Section 3 below).
Section 1: Not Found — Direct Verification Links
These universities have publicly accessible partner directories. CAU is not listed. Click the link; search for "Chung-Ang" — it is not there.
| QS | University | What Korea partners they list instead | Verify yourself |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | Nanyang Technological University, Singapore | Korea partners visible — CAU absent | NTU GEM Explorer: https://ntu-sa.terradotta.com/index.cfm?FuseAction=Programs.SearchResults&Sort=Program_Country&Order=asc&program_name=GEM%20Explorer&program_type_id=1&program_active=1&requiredminimumtofindismeet=0&partner_id=ANY& |
| 17 | University of California, Berkeley | KAIST, Korea U, SNU, Yonsei only | UCEAP Korea: https://uceap.universityofcalifornia.edu/programs?country[30]=30 |
| 35 | University of Manchester | Ewha, Korea U, SNU, Yonsei | Manchester Korea partners: https://www.manchester.ac.uk/study/international/study-abroad-exchange/partners/#korea |
| 62 | Duke University | Blank page; new exchanges frozen globally | Duke South Korea blank: https://global.duke.edu/countries/south-korea |
| 66 | UC San Diego | 26 Korea partners listed — CAU not among them | UCSD Korea exchange: https://ucsd.adv-pub.moveonca.com/database-report-page/ |
| 88 | Boston University | Seoul National University only for Korea exchange | BU Korea programs: https://www.bu.edu/abroad/explore-programs/find-a-program/?num=1&bu_progs_location=asia-oceania%2Cauckland%2Chong-kong%2Ckyoto%2Cseoul%2Cshanghai%2Csingapore%2Csonepat-india%2Csydney%2Ctaipei%2Ctokyo&q=korea |
| 88 | Purdue University (QS rank refers to main campus; CAU claims Purdue Northwest — a separate, lower-ranked campus) | CAU not listed at either campus | Purdue NW partnerships: https://www.pnw.edu/international-programs-partnerships/partnerships/ |
| 97 | University of Nottingham Ningbo | Korea partner list accessible — CAU absent | Nottingham partner list: https://www.nottingham.edu.cn/en/global/partnership/partner-list.aspx |
| 97 | University of Nottingham Malaysia | Same list, same result — CAU absent | Nottingham partner list: https://www.nottingham.edu.cn/en/global/partnership/partner-list.aspx |
| 100 | University of Zurich (CAU's agreement is Informatics faculty only — not institutional) | Pusan National, Ewha, Korea U, SNU, Yonsei — no CAU institutional listing | UZH full partner list: https://www.int.uzh.ch/en/out/program/world.html |
| 114 | Aalto University | Korea partners listed — CAU absent | Aalto School of Business partners: https://www.aalto.fi/en/school-of-business/international-partner-universities |
| 126 | Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (Faculty of Engineering agreement — expired 31 July 2025) | Engineering agreement found but expired — no active partnership | UKM partnerships: https://www.ukm.my/pha/partnership/ |
| 134 | Universiti Putra Malaysia | International collaborations listed — CAU absent | UPM global partnerships: https://www.upm.edu.my/international/global_partnership/international_collaborations-8321 |
| 140 | Erasmus University Rotterdam | Hanyang, Konkuk, Korea U (×2), SNU (×4), Yonsei — no CAU | EUR exchange partners: https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiNWRlNjllMGQtYjJlNi00MjBlLTg5ZWEtZWEyMWU3ZjY0YTE2IiwidCI6IjcxNTkwMmQ2LWY2M2UtNGI4ZC05MjliLTRiYjE3MGJhZDQ5MiIsImMiOjh9 |
| 151 | Southwestern University of Finance and Economics | Jeonju U, Duksung Womens U, Chungnam National, Hanyang — no CAU | SWUFE Asia partners: https://e.swufe.edu.cn/International/International_Partners/Asia.htm |
| 169 | University of York | GIST, SNU, Yonsei — no CAU | York study abroad: https://www.york.ac.uk/students/study-abroad/worldwide/ |
| 180 | IIT Madras (CAU claims exchange — IIT Madras records only an MOU; no student exchange) | DGIST, Hanyang, KAIST, Korea U, POSTECH, SNU, Sungkyunkwan, Yonsei — no CAU exchange | IIT Madras partner universities: https://ge.iitm.ac.in/mou/foreign-universities |
| 190 | Ohio State University (CAU claims exchange — OSU records only an MOU; the exchange programme is Sogang-only) | Sogang (Exchange), Korea U, Ewha, Yonsei, Soonchunhyang — CAU listed as MOU only, not exchange | OSU Korea exchange programs: https://globaleducation.osu.edu/index.cfm?FuseAction=Programs.SearchResults&Program_Type_ID=1&pc=South+Korea%7F&Sort=Program_Name&Order=asc |
| 210 | University of Minnesota | Korea University, Seoul only — CAU absent | UMN Korea programs: https://umabroad.umn.edu/nonuofm/programs |
| 224 | ADA University | Exchange programs listed — CAU absent | ADA exchange programs: https://www.ada.edu.az/en/experience/exchange-programs |
| 226 | Queensland University of Technology | Dong-A, Ewha, HUFS, Hanyang, KAIST, Korea U, Sungkyunkwan — no CAU | QUT Korea partners: https://www.qut.edu.au/study/international/apply-for-study-abroad/partner-institutions |
| 230 | Massey University | Chonnam National, Korea University Seoul only — no CAU | Massey Korea exchange: https://www.massey.ac.nz/study/study-abroad-and-student-exchange/overseas-exchanges-for-massey-students/where-you-can-go-on-student-exchange/ |
| 237 | American University of Beirut | OIP partner search accessible — CAU absent | AUB partner search: https://www.aub.edu.lb/oip/pages/search.aspx |
| 255 | Institut Teknologi Bandung | International partnerships listed — CAU absent | ITB international partnerships: https://partnership.itb.ac.id/international-partnerships/ |
| 278 | University of Sussex | Korea U (Competitive), SNU, Pusan, Ewha (Business) — no CAU | Sussex Korea destinations: https://student.sussex.ac.uk/options/abroad/destinations/asia#korea |
| 287 | Universitas Airlangga | International partners listed — CAU absent | Airlangga international partners: https://unair.ac.id/en/international-partners/ |
| 291 | University of the Witwatersrand | Strategic partnerships listed — CAU absent | Wits strategic partnerships: https://www.wits.ac.za/research/strategic-partnerships-office/ |
| 294 | Swinburne University | Exchange partner list accessible — CAU absent | Swinburne partner universities: https://www.swinburne.edu.au/life-at-swinburne/study-abroad-exchange/studying-a-semester-abroad/partner-universities/ |
| 331 | Satbayev University | Inter-cooperation page accessible — CAU absent | Satbayev inter-cooperation: https://satbayev.university/en/inter-cooperation |
| 339 | Shandong University (Weihai campus) (CAU claims SDU Weihai; only the Ji'nan campus verifies CAU) | SOE Global Partners page accessible — Weihai campus does not list CAU | SDU SOE partners: https://www.soe.sdu.edu.cn/International/Global_Partners.htm |
| 362 | Polytechnic University of the Philippines (CAU claims exchange — PUP records a 2018 MOU/MOA only; no active student exchange) | Site search for "Chung-Ang" returns no results | PUP International: https://www.pup.edu.ph/international/linkages |
| 366 | University of Turku (appears in MoveOn portal only in limited, non-institutional capacity) | Not listed as a university-wide exchange partner | Turku MoveOn portal: https://saas.solenovo.fi/move/destinationsearch/7299262 |
| 367 | Sciences Po Lille (previously AI-verified as confirmed; manual review of the same URL found only Myongji University and Chonbuk National University for Korea — CAU absent) | Only Myongji and Chonbuk National listed for Korea | Sciences Po Lille partenaires: https://www.sciencespo-lille.eu/partenaires |
| 371 | Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (Bogotá) | Partner database accessible; CAU absent | Javeriana convenios: https://www.javeriana.edu.co/internacionalizacion/convenios-alianzas |
| 381 | The American University in Cairo | Site search for "Chung-Ang" returns 0 results | AUC partner universities: https://www.aucegypt.edu/academics/study-abroad/partner-universities |
Section 2: No Publicly Accessible Partner Directory (as of March 2026)
These universities were claimed as partners by CAU. Their partner directories are either unavailable, behind login walls, return 404 errors, or are restricted to campus networks. We could not confirm CAU's presence — but neither could a prospective student.
| QS | University | Why the list is inaccessible |
|---|---|---|
| 58 | Universiti Malaya | Full list behind Google Form login; public partial list shows Chungnam National University only for Korea |
| 103 | Nanjing University of the Arts | Website inaccessible; no public partner directory |
| 181 | Cardiff University | No public exchange partner list accessible |
| 239 | Universidad de los Andes (Colombia) | Partner directory requires institutional login |
| 243 | University of Newcastle (Australia) | No public exchange partner list navigable |
| 249 | University of Porto | Partner list returns 404 or requires authentication |
| 285 | Harbin Institute of Technology (Weihai) | No separate public partner list for Weihai campus |
| 314 | UCSI University | No public international partner directory accessible |
| 317 | Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) | Exchange partner list not publicly navigable |
| 326 | University of Tasmania | Partner directory inaccessible |
| 334 | Tufts University | No public exchange partner list |
| 350 | Shandong University of Finance and Economics | No English-language partner directory |
| 367 | Sciences Po Bordeaux | No public partner list accessible |
| 388 | Beihang University | No public partner list navigable |
Section 3: Verified — But Misrepresented
Two CAU claims that technically pass verification carry material caveats that fundamentally change their meaning as evidence of institutional partnership.
| QS | University | What CAU claims | What verification found |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | University of Chicago | International partner | Verified via internal database search engine only — not a publicly visible student exchange listing. No independent manual confirmation is possible. This is the weakest evidentiary grade in the audit. |
| 54 | Hong Kong Polytechnic University | Institutional partner | A department-only LMS agreement — not a university-wide exchange partnership. CAU presents it as institutional. |
Appendix 1B — Sogang University: Not Reciprocated (Sector-Wide Comparison)
Included for comparative context. Sogang's audit returned a 41% reciprocity rate in the same audited tier — higher than CAU, but still documenting that a majority of its highest-ranked claimed partnerships are not confirmed by the partner institutions' own records.
Section 1: Not Found — Direct Verification Links
Section 2: No Publicly Accessible Partner Directory
| QS | University | Why the list is inaccessible |
|---|---|---|
| 224 | University of Antwerp | No public exchange partner directory accessible |
| 367 | Sciences Po Bordeaux | No public partner list accessible |
Section 3: Verified — But Programme-Specific Only
| QS | University | Caveat |
|---|---|---|
| 131 | Stockholm University | Listed for one department only — not institutional exchange |
| 188 | Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF) | Listed for 10 specific programmes only — not a blanket institutional partnership |
Methodology Note
This audit was conducted in two phases. Phase 1 used automated browser-based verification (Browserbase) to check partner directories at scale. Phase 2 applied manual human review to all ambiguous, borderline, and disputed entries. A total of 28 corrections were applied on March 8, 2026, including the downgrade of Sciences Po Lille from Verified to Not Found and the upgrade of NKUA Athens from Not Found to Verified (bilateral PDF dated January 2025 confirmed).
The raw audit data, including all status values, evidence URLs, notes, and timestamps for all 103 entries covering both CAU and Sogang, is available as a CSV file: https://github.com/Gender-Watchdog/cau-timeline-website/blob/main/evidence/20260309-cau-reciprocity-audit/audit_results.csv
-
CAU motto and official history. https://neweng.cau.ac.kr/cms/FR_CON/index.do?MENU_ID=240 ↩
-
Gender Watchdog Reciprocity Audit,
audit_results.csv(March 8, 2026, manually corrected, 28 corrections applied). https://github.com/Gender-Watchdog/cau-timeline-website/blob/main/evidence/20260309-cau-reciprocity-audit/audit_results.csv ↩ -
Professor John Ioannidis, Stanford University Meta-Research Innovation Center, email correspondence with Gender Watchdog, January 2026. https://github.com/Gender-Watchdog/genderwatchdog_metookorea2025/blob/master/email_emls/decoded/ionnadis-ranking-orgs-chain/decoded_RE_%20China%20%E2%80%98marked%20down%E2%80%99%20in%20retraction-adjusted%20rankings%20_%20The%20Input%20Side%20of%20Ranking%20Fraud%20(Case%20Study)%202026-01-17T02_29_40%2B09_00.eml ↩ ↩2 ↩3
-
Gender Watchdog Blog, "The 'Panic Scrub' Spreads: Chung-Ang and Sogang Universities Go Dark" (Feb 11, 2026). https://blog.genderwatchdog.org/panic-scrub-spreads-chung-ang-sogang-go-dark ↩ ↩2
-
Gender Watchdog Blog, "The Harvard of Korea Has Pulled the Plug: SNU Goes Dark" (Jan 26, 2026). https://blog.genderwatchdog.org/the-harvard-of-korea-has-pulled-the-plug-snu-goes-dark/ ↩ ↩2
-
Korea Times, "Chung-Ang and Doosan" (Sep 24, 2008). https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/nation/2024/09/113_31605.html ↩ ↩2
-
Wikipedia, Chung-Ang University (citing Ohmynews Feb 23, 2009; Kyunghyang Shinmun Feb 26, 2009; Yonhap Jul 27, 2010). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chung-Ang_University ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4
-
Korea Times, "Chung-Ang probe spills to Doosan, Woori" (May 1, 2015). https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/southkorea/20150501/chung-ang-probe-spills-to-doosan-woori ↩ ↩2 ↩3
-
Korea Times, "Doosan Heavy chairman resigns" (Apr 21, 2015). https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/nation/2018/06/113_177508.html ↩ ↩2
-
Korea Times, "Park Yong-sung to be questioned" (May 13, 2015). https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/southkorea/20150513/park-yong-sung-to-be-questioned ↩
-
NamuWiki, 교수/범죄 [footnotes 23–27] (citing national press coverage 1998–2003). https://namu.wiki/w/%EA%B5%90%EC%88%98/%EB%B2%94%EC%A3%84 ↩ ↩2
-
Hankyung, "중앙대 교수 성희롱 의혹…" (Jun 4, 2018). https://www.hankyung.com/article/201806047731Y ↩ ↩2 ↩3
-
Seoul Sinmun (May 24, 2018). https://www.seoul.co.kr/news/society/accident/2018/05/24/20180524500160 ↩
-
Hankyung / Korea Economic Daily (Mar 20, 2018). https://www.hankyung.com/society/article/201803208255Y ↩ ↩2 ↩3
-
Kado / Gangwon Ilbo (Mar 20, 2018). https://www.kado.net/news/articleView.html?idxno=903558 ↩
-
NamuWiki, 중앙대학교/사건사고 (citing national press coverage 2014–2018). https://namu.wiki/w/%EC%A4%91%EC%95%99%EB%8C%80%ED%95%99%EA%B5%90/%EC%82%AC%EA%B1%B4%EC%82%AC%EA%B3%A0 ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4
-
News1, "중앙대 영문과 교수 성폭력 사건" (Nov 28, 2018). https://www.news1.kr/society/general-society/3487887 ↩
-
SBS News (Nov 28, 2018). https://news.sbs.co.kr/news/endPage.do?news_id=N1005034822 ↩
-
News1, "중앙대, A교수 최종 해임 결정" (Jun 18, 2019). https://www.news1.kr/society/incident-accident/3648886 ↩
-
Korean Women's Development Institute (KWDI), 2020 Report on Sexual Violence in Korean University Arts and Culture Programs (2020). 61.5% of female students in arts/culture programs; structural risk index 81/100 for film and media departments. ↩
-
Korea Times, "University professors commit most campus sexual offenses" (Jun 2, 2021). 66% of all sexual violence at Korean universities perpetrated by male-dominated faculty. ↩
-
GSAIM official site: https://gsaim.cau.ac.kr; CAU official history (BK21, CJ E&M, Netflix): https://neweng.cau.ac.kr/cms/FR_CON/index.do?MENU_ID=240 ↩